Windsor Suites Hotel Bangkok, Bangkok hotels Thailand on apriltravel.com

*Reviews of recent stays*	*Comment on the hotel*	*The reservation service*
Michael Jurgensen 2010-06-04	Windsor Suites Hotel Bangkok, Sukhumvit Road, Soi 20 Excellent location, very close to shopping area, sky-train and whatever you need in central down-town Bangkok. We stayed in the new Pano-suite (updated minister suite)30 floor, great view of Bangkok. Hotel is though in a need of general update, many things are too-much-used over the years and need to be refreshed. Have stayed in the hotel many times before and will come back.	As always quick and fantastic service, thanks!
Hansen 2010-03-21	Windsor Suites Hotel Bangkok, Sukhumvit Road, Soi 20 good Locationen near the skytrain, and in a quite street. We lived in a Minister suite which is nice, but the furniture is a bit old. We think that it was good value for the money (2499 bath pro night.)
chow/chunchiu 2010-03-05	Windsor Suites Hotel Bangkok, Sukhumvit Road, Soi 20 most of staffs r not rude.not professional.room s very old n dirty.i always travel to bkk,that s the worse hotel in my experience.nver n nver stay in this hotel agian.	excellent
Suzanne Chen 2010-03-04	Windsor Suites Hotel Bangkok, Sukhumvit Road, Soi 20 I stayed hotel during its promotion, my room was upgraded to Minister Suite, but the suite is fine and value for money. BTW, the hotel is very close to MRT (Sukhumvit) and BTS (Asok)stations, also it is very colse to AE3 Airport Express bus stop (Aork), which is a good help to connect any place of Bangkok.
Huber Erich 2010-01-07	Windsor Suites Hotel Bangkok, Sukhumvit Road, Soi 20 We were already 2 times in the hotel. The last time is a few years back already. The tooth of time gnaws prepared on the building. The rooms must be already renovated. The next time we will book another hotel.	Quickly and competently. Thanks Sawadee.com.
Megumi shigura 2009-12-30	Windsor Suites Hotel Bangkok, Sukhumvit Road, Soi 20 The reservation was very good, kindly, I will try again with
miss amanda icely 2009-12-29	Windsor Suites Hotel Bangkok, Sukhumvit Road, Soi 20 we spent 2 nights at this hotel, staff were friendly, rooms were clean, nice pool area, no problems. recieved a free room upgrade on arrival to main building too, would stay here again.	no problems
Keith Huewen 2009-12-20	Windsor Suites Hotel Bangkok, Sukhumvit Road, Soi 20 I ve stayed at the hotel before but don t remember the rooms to be so dated or badly seviced. Check in was very slow, not enough desk points. The Minister Suite we d booked had very tired decor, was grubby and had ants on the sink surfaces. It looked nothing like the photo on Sawadee.com. I asked to be moved and was given a much better room in the Garden Wing... but beware, there is absolutely no view of the city, (one of the main reasons to book this hotel). However, the price was very good and overall, considering the Soi 20 location, quite good value, (we were on a 3 for 2 night deal). BUT DON T TAKE THE TAXI DEAL ON SAWADEE.COM. You pay over twice the going rate from Bangkok airport to the hotel.	Great system and really easy to use. However, the taxi service offered from BKK to our hotel was too expensive and the Sawadee sitecouldn t cope, (or was too difficult to change), with cancelling this option after the initial booking. Don t use this service, get a taxi at the hotel for half the price!
Michael Evans 2009-11-19	Windsor Suites Hotel Bangkok, Sukhumvit Road, Soi 20 I have stayed at this hotel 3 times now and each time I have found it to be very good value. For me the position is perfect, within easy reach of everything you need.	I haven t had any problems what-so-ever Each time that I have booked with sawadee.com, whether it be hotel bookings or trips/shows etc. I have had no problems at all
Peter Kolderup-Finstad 2009-11-15	Windsor Suites Hotel Bangkok, Sukhumvit Road, Soi 20 we been staying at this hotel almost every year since 2001 and the standard seem to detorirate not much, but slowly. we had to ask the manager of he breafast restaurant to have bacon, because the chef did not want to serve it. Less personnel than it use to be. But still good hotel for the money.